Signals, execution, risk, analytics and review live in one system, but each layer stays independent enough to measure, disable and improve without guessing.
Weighted evidence from trend, structure, momentum, volatility, session, event risk and strategy-specific confirmations produces a transparent score instead of a mystery arrow.
Every order still has to pass independent account-level safety rules.
Market, limit and stop entries; bracket logic; multi-target exits; partials; breakeven; trailing; runners and scaling.
Multiple terminals, brokers and eventually prop-style rule profiles with separate controls and audit histories.
News, speeches, scheduled releases and broker-specific restrictions can pause entries or modify management behavior.
Compare thresholds, confirmations, timeframes, sessions, stop methods and management rules against the same evidence set. Version every meaningful change so improvement can be proven rather than remembered.
Review wins, losses, rejected setups, missed opportunities, drawdown, R expectancy, streaks, time-to-target and which filters actually add value.
Explain a rejection, summarize the week, compare strategy versions, surface recurring failure modes and turn raw logs into questions worth testing.
MT4 is first, MT5 is next, TradingView can feed alerts/webhooks, and broker APIs can plug into the same risk and audit engine later.
Every screen is being designed now so the next six months can improve both the trading logic and the experience around it.